
  Luca Farulli - Paradigma’s changes of mimesis. About the works of Bianco-Valente, 2008
  
The blue eye in “Rem” (1995) looks out astounded, as if exonerated from its own  ancient organic body: a blackbox flung away from a falling vehicle. This is the  beginning of the sub specie imaginis exploration developed by Bianco-Valente.  Even before the cold investigation of the dualism between body and mind, the  beginning of their work comes from a ‘tenderness’ towards what is happening,  towards time, to the shape taken by the body over a long time: towards its  modern cultural re-writing.
    
    Echoing Walter Ong, we may correctly speak of a  precise phase of “organization of the sensorial”1, which is being reconfigured  through new- electronic- “cultural interfaces” (Lev Manovic). The astonishment  is tied to a body in transition and is symbolised by the organ which represents  thought: the eye. 
    On the one hand this shows the question-sensation: which body  am I in? What is happening to me? On the other hand the eye plays out  images-memories, images-sensations, crystals of time. Sides of a glacier, which  separate from the original body and take, imbedded in them, past geological  periods, stratifications of time, where fossils are conserved, souvenirs of  preceding life. 
  
    Rast machen: time to rest. Over a decade, from “Rem” to  “Relational Domain” (2005), Bianco-Valente have chosen to address the subject  of “remains”, that which is left, continuing to resist, even if merely  residual, as an element of disturbance. It almost seems as if they choose a material  dimension of the mind which makes it a fjord of the body. Like an unusual  “exploration of a myth”, the brain is investigated for its temporal  stratification, its being the body of thoughts with all the mysteries which a  storeroom such as the body knows how to keep. Exempt from a particular  historical phase of corporeal configuration, this body-mind is subject to  re-adaptations, to ages which are perceptive and sensitive, but, as Goethe  famously said, it conserves it’s own memory as an organ. 
  
    A geological specimen,  a shard of nature, it is the counterpoint to the present, to the future:  ultimately, with time in its progressive meaning. In this sense  Bianco-Valente’s choice to use video loops as a narrative device is a perfect  strategy, in terms of protecting the “remains”. Indeed the loop corresponds to  the bobbin which the child described by Freud in Beyond the Pleasure  Principle, uses to make mother reappear. The bobbin thrown under the bed  symbolises the leaving of the mother; the bobbin pulled back to him symbolises  the reappearance of the mother. 
    The loop repeats ad libitum the process  of emergence of a mnestic remnant, of an experiential nature that doesn’t want  to be set aside. Rather, as a narrative device it works as a recovering of  lived time which has taken on the degraded nature of a memory which no longer  has a pedestal, as a quotation which has lost its phrase of origin. For a  magical and mysterious effect the loop-bobbin goes back and forth between now  and then, retrieving the ancient song again and again, the old tune which  returns. This is what happens when one moves from one’s body. 
  
    The  attention which Bianco-valente pay to the  brain as the body for thoughts, to the material nature of mental processes, has  a further important implication for the overall aspect of the image. The image  is the re-emergence, or rather the obstinate “remains” which are maintaining  resistance, an image-emotion, image-passion. What the image puts at stake is  not simply the recording of mere perceptive information or the fictive  re-elaboration of processes. 
  
    Rather it is a strategy for reclaiming the live  sensation, that nervous contact before there has been any intellectual  mediation. It remains captured in an image which is always internal and external  - as a splash of colour, as a chromatic effect in the various mind landscapes  where the video and the strobe light bring out all the possible colours of the  living world. It is precisely here that we can understand the appeal of the  only painter mentioned by Bianco-Valente: Francis Bacon, about whom Gilles  Deleuze said: “every sensation, every figure, is by its nature an  ‘accumulated’, ‘coagulated’ sensation, like a lime scale formation: the firmly  synthetic nature of sensation(2). 
    Here we come to the work which moves from  “Relational Domain” to “Over the Noise Floor” (2007), where we find ourselves  in a strange kind of journey: a network of axes on a map of flight-paths3, a  net-like structure, made by an electronic spider, blown by a whispered  dialogue. This new area of research only makes sense if we consider the work  “Self Organizing Structures ” (2004)(4).
  
    Without disregarding the “remains” which  underlie this argument, that is, the body of thought in which the smallest  elements of sensations and passions are inscribed, here we see a significant  epistemological paradigm shift or rather its re-orientation to its different  progression. The attention of Bianco-Valente’s research is no longer simply the  mental environment or else the problems of the relationship between mind and  body in a period of transition towards a new bodily configuration. Instead it  is the living being whilst it is still living. Bianco-Valente have committed  themselves to crossing this threshold, the new season of the confrontation  between art and science. 
    The chosen paradigm qualifies this dialogue: that of Bίου, of the  living. Indeed, endoscopic vision leads to an access without distance to the  living in its very field of emergence (Entstehungherd), as if one were to  choose to go down into the volcano to see the process of the fusion of lava,  instead of standing on the slopes to observe the lava flow. It is no longer the  confrontation of man and machine, no longer just mental images. Instead it is  the elaboration of a different order of images: the choice of a different  epistemological paradigm.
  
    The synapses, the neural cells which wage war against  each other in the field of the “will of power”, without teleological remains. Nietzsche  states in a posthumous fragment of 1888: “things behave with regularity, not  according to a rule [...]. 
    There is no obedience here since that something  is as it is, so strong, so weak, is not a consequence of obedience or of a  rule or a constriction… the degree of resistance and the degree of excessive  power- this is what every event is about”5. Regarding this beginning, “Relational  Domain”, “Tempo universale”, accept the invitation: “get on the boats,  philosophers!”(6).
  
  Notes
    1) On the subject Ong, writes: “the relationship between sound and the word  itself with the living human world also changes. The sound and the world must  therefore be considered as a relationship between the senses which is changing.  […] In this relationship it is useful to consider cultures as organisations of  the sensorial. By sensorial we mean the entire sensorial apparatus as an  operating complex” (W. Ong, The Presence of the Word [1967], tr. it.  a cura di R. Barilli, Bologna,   Il Mulino, 1970, p.12.  Underlining by the author).
  
    2) G. Deleuze, Francis Bacon. Logique de la sensation [1981], it. tr.,  Macerata, Qodlibet, 1995, p. 87. The reference to Bacon’s painting is  to be found in the intense interview by Pierluigi Castrati in July 2003, which  can be found at biancovalente. com. the question represents an essential  artistic node for the reading of Bianco-Valente’s image structuring, which it  would be interesting to consider further on another occasion.
  
    3) It would be worth considering the question of the map model in depth to  identify the elements of difference and affinity to the descriptive scheme of  the map which recurs in Dutch painting of the seventeenth century, as  highlighted in the noteable essay by S. Alpers, The Art of Describing. Dutch  Art in the Seventeenth Century, [1983] tr.it, Turin, Boringhieri, 1984. This represents a  further subject of investigation of the relationship between art and science,  as it is developed by Bianco-Valente.
  
    4) The work was made with the musical contribution by Mass.
  
    5) F. Nietzsche, Nachgelassene Fragmenten 1888-1889, It. tr., Milan,  Adelphi, 1974, Vol. VIII/III, pp. 47-48.
  
    6) F. Nietzsche, Die fröhliche Wissenschaft, op. cit., Vol. V/II, p. 166.
    _
    Taken from Alfabeto Esteso, Bianco-Valente, Dario De bastiani Editore, Vittorio Veneto (TV), 2008